A Texas woman has filed a lawsuit against Valero Energy Corporation after her car was reportedly damaged by contaminated fuel. The case has drawn attention because such incidents are not rare, especially after major weather events.
The Lawsuit in Galveston County
On August 19, 2024, Judy A. Boles filed a lawsuit in Galveston County claiming that her car became unusable after she bought contaminated fuel. According to the lawsuit, she purchased petrol from a Valero station in La Marque, Texas, on May 18, 2024.
The fuel had been supplied by Potent Petroleum, a Houston-based company that has been in business since 2012.
Progressive County Mutual, her insurer, said that the damage led to repair costs or loss in vehicle value amounting to $3,510.88. The case accuses Valero of negligence, though the lawsuit does not explain what type of contamination was present.
How Fuel Gets Contaminated
While this particular case does not detail the source of contamination, experts note that water often mixes with fuel after severe weather events. Water in petrol can cause serious damage to vehicles, making them stall or break down.
After Hurricane Beryl hit the Texas coast in July 2024, the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation issued a warning about contaminated fuel. The department explained that flooding often allows water to seep into underground fuel tanks. Dealers were reminded to regularly check their tanks and filters to prevent such issues.
Interestingly, around May 18, when Boles bought the fuel, Houston was struck by a derecho – a powerful windstorm with speeds crossing 100 mph. It caused massive destruction, though it is still unclear if this event had anything to do with the alleged contamination.
Valero’s History With Fuel Issues
This is not the first time Valero has faced complaints about bad fuel. Back in 2008, the company paid compensation to around 150 customers in Corpus Christi and Nueces Counties. Those customers claimed their cars were damaged after buying petrol from Valero stations.
Although state agencies could not prove contamination, Valero still paid for repairs but maintained it was not at fault.
Current Status of the Case
As of now, neither Valero Energy Corporation nor Potent Petroleum has responded to the lawsuit. Progressive Insurance also declined to comment. The case highlights ongoing concerns about fuel quality and the need for regular checks, especially after extreme weather conditions.
The lawsuit against Valero Energy once again raises the issue of fuel contamination and its impact on consumers. Whether it comes from flooding, storms, or poor maintenance, contaminated fuel can cause costly damage to vehicles.
The outcome of this case may push fuel providers to take stricter measures to ensure fuel quality and protect customers from future losses.
